<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The iFuture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.law21.ca/2010/02/04/the-ifuture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.law21.ca/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law21.ca%2F2010%2F02%2F04%2Fthe-ifuture%2F%23comment-&#038;seed_title=The+iFuture</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a legal profession on the brink</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Furlong</title>
		<link>http://www.law21.ca/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law21.ca%2F2010%2F02%2F04%2Fthe-ifuture%2F%23comment-1420&#038;seed_title=The+iFuture/comment-page-1/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Furlong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law21.ca/?p=1311#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>Disney&#039;s an intriguing thought -- it&#039;s developing into kind of a maverick among the studios (the only major not to sign up to a recent Hollywood collective to make movies available for download on the web, presumably to protect its interests for future developments). Unlike the other entertainment giants, it has a theme and a brand -- family programming -- that has already been extended to other industries (e.g., Disney Cruise Lines) and could conceivably be adapted to the professional services market (e.g., &quot;Trust your family estate planning to Disney Enterprises.&quot;) Not sure they could do much with the divorce sector, but you never know....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disney&#8217;s an intriguing thought &#8212; it&#8217;s developing into kind of a maverick among the studios (the only major not to sign up to a recent Hollywood collective to make movies available for download on the web, presumably to protect its interests for future developments). Unlike the other entertainment giants, it has a theme and a brand &#8212; family programming &#8212; that has already been extended to other industries (e.g., Disney Cruise Lines) and could conceivably be adapted to the professional services market (e.g., &#8220;Trust your family estate planning to Disney Enterprises.&#8221;) Not sure they could do much with the divorce sector, but you never know&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.law21.ca/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law21.ca%2F2010%2F02%2F04%2Fthe-ifuture%2F%23comment-1414&#038;seed_title=The+iFuture/comment-page-1/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law21.ca/?p=1311#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>Even more interesting: what would happen if Disney got into the legal business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even more interesting: what would happen if Disney got into the legal business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Barrett</title>
		<link>http://www.law21.ca/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law21.ca%2F2010%2F02%2F04%2Fthe-ifuture%2F%23comment-1410&#038;seed_title=The+iFuture/comment-page-1/#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law21.ca/?p=1311#comment-1410</guid>
		<description>@Yves

If a lawyer is willing to take a laptop everywhere and deal with the associated overhead (with the benefit of more horsepower), then yeah, there is no real benefit. But I think these devices are about fitting into different spaces of work. When I have time to work at my desk or home office, a laptop is the most appropriate tool. When I am watching my kid&#039;s soccer game and need to dash off a quick email to a client, the iPhone is the best tool. The iPad will fit nicely in that space between: I need to hammer out a short letter or approve some final changes to the merger agreement while on the road. While I&#039;m &lt;i&gt;sorta&lt;/i&gt; able to do this on the iPhone with tools like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quickoffice.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;QuickOffice&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://secure.logmein.com/US/products/ignition/iPhone/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LogMeIn&lt;/a&gt;, I&#039;d much rather know that I can quickly open a full sized document and type on a full sized keyboard even if my laptop is unavailable. More to the point, I&#039;ve largely quit carrying a laptop since I&#039;ve had my iPhone but I think I will carry the iPad for those other needs.

I still agree with you though that it will also be terrific entertainment / leisure machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yves</p>
<p>If a lawyer is willing to take a laptop everywhere and deal with the associated overhead (with the benefit of more horsepower), then yeah, there is no real benefit. But I think these devices are about fitting into different spaces of work. When I have time to work at my desk or home office, a laptop is the most appropriate tool. When I am watching my kid&#8217;s soccer game and need to dash off a quick email to a client, the iPhone is the best tool. The iPad will fit nicely in that space between: I need to hammer out a short letter or approve some final changes to the merger agreement while on the road. While I&#8217;m <i>sorta</i> able to do this on the iPhone with tools like <a href="http://www.quickoffice.com/" rel="nofollow">QuickOffice</a> and <a href="https://secure.logmein.com/US/products/ignition/iPhone/" rel="nofollow">LogMeIn</a>, I&#8217;d much rather know that I can quickly open a full sized document and type on a full sized keyboard even if my laptop is unavailable. More to the point, I&#8217;ve largely quit carrying a laptop since I&#8217;ve had my iPhone but I think I will carry the iPad for those other needs.</p>
<p>I still agree with you though that it will also be terrific entertainment / leisure machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.law21.ca/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law21.ca%2F2010%2F02%2F04%2Fthe-ifuture%2F%23comment-1380&#038;seed_title=The+iFuture/comment-page-1/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law21.ca/?p=1311#comment-1380</guid>
		<description>Jordan, I&#039;ve been following your blog for a couple of weeks now and really like what you are doing. Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan, I&#8217;ve been following your blog for a couple of weeks now and really like what you are doing. Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves Faguy</title>
		<link>http://www.law21.ca/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law21.ca%2F2010%2F02%2F04%2Fthe-ifuture%2F%23comment-1376&#038;seed_title=The+iFuture/comment-page-1/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Faguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law21.ca/?p=1311#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>Jordan, I share your thoughts on the design and the customer experience.  Still, I fail to see how the iPad (how could they have called it anything else?) makes lawyers any more mobile than they are with a laptop or an iPhone.   In the end the iPad, I think, is a product intended for leisure, rather than an office tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan, I share your thoughts on the design and the customer experience.  Still, I fail to see how the iPad (how could they have called it anything else?) makes lawyers any more mobile than they are with a laptop or an iPhone.   In the end the iPad, I think, is a product intended for leisure, rather than an office tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Krebs</title>
		<link>http://www.law21.ca/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law21.ca%2F2010%2F02%2F04%2Fthe-ifuture%2F%23comment-1374&#038;seed_title=The+iFuture/comment-page-1/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Krebs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law21.ca/?p=1311#comment-1374</guid>
		<description>I like Apple analogy as well.  Just like everyone does not use a Mac or an iPhone nevertheless they have a clear brand that relates to the experience. I think when people say they hire the lawyer and not the firm much of that has to do with the experience; what can the firm do to make that applicable to all its lawyers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Apple analogy as well.  Just like everyone does not use a Mac or an iPhone nevertheless they have a clear brand that relates to the experience. I think when people say they hire the lawyer and not the firm much of that has to do with the experience; what can the firm do to make that applicable to all its lawyers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Furlong</title>
		<link>http://www.law21.ca/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law21.ca%2F2010%2F02%2F04%2Fthe-ifuture%2F%23comment-1373&#038;seed_title=The+iFuture/comment-page-1/#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Furlong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law21.ca/?p=1311#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>It would be intriguing to see what an Apple-designed law firm would look like. Especially after several generations of firms that seem to have been designed by Microsoft. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be intriguing to see what an Apple-designed law firm would look like. Especially after several generations of firms that seem to have been designed by Microsoft. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Cartier Liebel</title>
		<link>http://www.law21.ca/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law21.ca%2F2010%2F02%2F04%2Fthe-ifuture%2F%23comment-1372&#038;seed_title=The+iFuture/comment-page-1/#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Cartier Liebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law21.ca/?p=1311#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>Jordan, this is an excellent analogy between iPad the the IFuture of law firms.  Who do you think will grab a hold of the concept of  law firm design first :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan, this is an excellent analogy between iPad the the IFuture of law firms.  Who do you think will grab a hold of the concept of  law firm design first :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

